Not in regard to nukes I think. Just to replace the Lincoln until the Canberra entered service
Yeah, we only used them as conventional long range bombers until the Canberra and V-Force came into service. Although given they used the same mountings, they could of been fitted with nukes if the RAF were so inclined to use them as such.
I don’t think regular B-29’s had access to nukes, they needed the Silverplate / Saddletree modification to fit the Pumpkin(Fat Man).
And I don’t particularly know about the VB-13 (Tallboy w/ RAZON tailkit) in British service.
Did I spy an exocet & a martlet in that trailer as well? Or am I just failing to recognise missiles.
Not sure where else to ask this, so I’ll ask here. Which control setting is responsible for zoom in Targeting Optics View?
1 Like
Assuming you mean Martel, but no didn’t see either myself.
Why bother it will be just another British system nerfed.
“We dont believe it can loiter”
You’re correct, I did mean martel, at what point do the british run out of birds to name their missiles after?
By the time we can reasonably re-use names like Typhoon, Tornado, Nimrod, Lightning,
Need to bring back Kestrel and Hurricane as well as Spitfire
Still waiting for them to name something like a nuclear bomb called “The Goose” or “Swan”
So where are we thinking the M1A2 is going to be in the tech tree, at the end of the Vickers line?
its following the Mk.7
also, if the anti-ERA performance of the M829A3 is a new feature to the game, could we bug report L27A1 to get it as well?
1 Like
To use a modern phrase
I’m cooked
Time to bug report
2 Likes
saw someone (i think it was you actually) mention the T-80U purchase, so I’ve grabbed screenshots from the live server protection analysis of M829A2 (just to check how different it is), DM53, and L27A1 against the T-80U, as well as against T-90M
1 Like
Wasnt me, but was in the convo, here is that post
1 Like
No wonder people have gotten ill from the shaking
2 Likes