Terrible idea.
67 Likes
Singapore to China, are you for real?
55 Likes
Really seems like your primary concern is always “what can we add that has the most copy/paste”
I also think you should stop adding western vehicles to RU/China and vice versa.
Whats the point of having nation TTs at all if you have both types of vehicles in 1 lineup.
The more unique the vehicles feel and the TTs are, the better the game is.
24 Likes
Remember when you let realism be decided by a community vote? I remember.
Stop pretending to be about realism if you are only going to apply it selectively when it suits you.
49 Likes
Leopard 2SG would be pretty cool
3 Likes
Before the community post only the Chinese community was upset
Now everyone is upset
🙃
82 Likes
this has nothing to do with the actual conversation going on
it’s damage control speaking around everything at hand
5 Likes
Honestly more I read this response its completly missing the point. Instead of calming things down or giving some sort of timeframe for final decision, its the usual corpo speak that gives no real answer and it just pours more oil into the fire.
“Oh we hear your concerns about thai VT-4 so were considering to add singapore to the chinese TT”
58 Likes
Guys I want you guys to remember, Gaijin wants to add Singapore to China, and we use French, British, American, German and Israeli equipments, so China is effectively getting:
American: M551, F-35A, F-35B, F-15SG, F-16C/D, F-5S, A-4SU, M113
British: Hunter F.74
French: AMX-13, SAMP/T, AMX-10P, AMX-10P (90mm)
Israeli: Hunter AFV, AMX-13 SM-1, F-16D+, SPYDER
German: Leopard 2A4, Leopard 2SG
Oh and Gaijin, thank you for once again proving the leakers right for the umpteenth time
Edit: I got so angry I forgot the Leopard 2s
117 Likes
Please provide the photos or videos showing the T-84 using BTA-4 and GP125. There are no available sources indicating that the T-84 is capable of employing these rounds
Furthermore, the Issues section needs a complete overhaul. It cannot be left in a state where moderators apply labels based on their own arbitrary judgment, and where reports for Chinese vehicles are consistently sidelined, taking years to be implemented—if they ever are. We genuinely hope to end the widespread saying: “Passed ≠ Implemented”
22 Likes
why…seriously why. I’m struggling to find any reasonable rationale for putting singapore into china. I dont get how you are able to link singapore to china logically. Have you actually done any research about singapore?
37 Likes
Its impressive how tone deaf Gaijin is
28 Likes
I mean this was literally the only outcome, you alienate one group and then bend to their cries and now the other side feels alienated. It was never gonna be an easy problem.
4 Likes
he hell no
What will happen first, will gaijin directly adress the thai VT-4 issue or will certain list be released?
4 Likes
A whole lot of corpo talk for literally nothing.
Here’s a tldr: Hello, more premiums coming, we don’t care about the state of the game.
33 Likes
china already has
Japanese,
Russian,
American,
Pakistani,
French,
German.
equipment, they really dont seem to understand how much they have that is foreign already
29 Likes
bruh if china is going to get Taiwan AND singapore then remove the Pakistani and bangladeshi vehicles and make their own tree smh.
9 Likes
I didn’t found any kind of answer from here, but why Singapore is going for China??? Absolute nonsense.
3 Likes