Of course, was just responding to the guy that said bugs associated with the Pantsir gets solved immediately, which doesn’t seem to be true.
2 Likes
still waiting for LDRICM to get fixed
3 Likes
Still weird that the IRIS-T gets deflected by L-DIRCM, when it was designed with anti L-DIRCM in mind…
4 Likes
LDIRCCM
mouthful
Too much word😭
be happy that it wasnt germans who made up these acronyms…
" Panzerspähwagen ( schwere Panzerbüchse 41) Sonderkraftfahrzeug 221"
And
“Flugabwehrraketensystem Roland auf Radkraftfahrzeug”
I’m extremely glad it wasn’t named by them 😂
the name is just a description
but the acronyms always have so many extra letters
like its FlaRakRad
instead of FRR
so i guess… also good thing Diehl named IRIS-T and now the Bw…
Tru but it gets the point across more when you say the whole 50+ character name 😂
Problem wit FRR is that it could mean something different and isn’t unique enough
thats what numbers are for 😭😭
this really bugs me with newer weapons, especially non US made ones… the british really hate numbers but the germans arent much better either.
instead of FlaRakRad it couldve been MIM-43 or something idk
that is the missile and not the system
if you want numbers go to the soviets they have nice stuff like:
the BM 9A35M which fires the 9M37M also known as the Strela
I know this is a video about the “normal” IRIS-T but there might be some information that might help for the SLM (uncertain).
At the absolute start of the video next to the orange “explosives” warning sticker it says “NEQ 61kg” , which means that the total amount of explosives (booster plus warhead) is 61 kg so 30.5kg per missile. If there is any known information about the propellant weight then the warhead weight can be inferred from that info (or the other way around). I don’t know if it’s at all relevant or needed but i thought i’d share either way :)
1 Like
Ah, okey, thx. Better safe than sorry though ^^
1 Like
Its fine.
Tho it is sad, that lock range report did not go through, as it is too vague, so IRIS-T lock range is kept as a glorified R-23T
2 Likes
I sort of understand their reasoning behind that one though, that is vague. “Matching” can both mean “has the same number” as well as “complements” , so sadly it isn’t clear enough to make any changes based on it. While i personally do believe that it is the former option, it is objectively not definitively that.
No, Their problem was that the target is unknown. So even if i siad that it could be added in the most optimistic scenario, so high speed high alt afterburning target, what they need is lock ranges agains specific targets, like for example old british docs that give 9L lock range against for example a tornado in each aspect. Something that is quite impossible to get for modern missiles.
best thing like that for SLM we have is a random shooting video, that by no means prove anything.
1 strand of code or rather it’s absence
L-DIRCM.immunity(yes);
Is making us closer to dragons being addead as playable CAS.
Because why not? We already got magic shields…
9A35M is the launcher vehicle, 9M37M is the missile, the system is called 9K35.
the HAWK for example is like this: MIM-23 is the system, MIM-23A is the missile, AN/TSQ-23 is the TOC, etcetc, M192 is the Launcher.
Patriot is similar
it could work ngl
A for the SLM
B for the SLS
C for the SLX
D for HYDEF
eh who cares