I’ll admit I don’t know a lot about the sm2 however, I don’t think the EFT AESA is on par with the Rafale. Though, I could be wrong.
As usual, never any attention for sim
1 Like
British phantoms have much worse radar and worse radar missiles, plus no hmd which is definitely useful. Youve definitely never played them.
Both Netz should get Derby missiles and a BR change IMO.
Vehicle: MiG-29SMT (9-19)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic/Simulaltor
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason: Unlike the MiG-29M/KR, it has only two air-to-surface missile attachment points.
EFT Needs bug fixes and it would be fine
Yes. I agree. Most nations need major bug fixes. However I am talking about things in their current state. Merkava armor bugs have been accepted for 4 years with no fixes. I don’t have high hopes for fixes.
Vehicle: Su-27SM
Gamemode: Ground Realistic/Simulaltor
BR Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Reason: Like the MiG-29M/KR, it has four air-to-surface missile attachment points.
2 Likes
Vehicle: Su-30МК2 AMV (and ␗Su-30MKK)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic/Simulaltor
BR Change: 12.3 → 12.7
Reason: Unlike the MiG-29M/KR (and JH-7A2), it has full six air-to-surface missile attachment points.
2 Likes
This has got to be an April fools joke right? in August? Theres no way this can be real. A6M5s equal BR to 6.0 super props? a 5.0 plane? 50 extra cannon rounds over the base A6M5 is equal to a 1.0 increase?
Meanwhile:
Only gets a GRB increase. The Yak3U is a plane that outperforms the A6M5s so massively that these two should never even be able to see each other in a battle, and yet the A6M5 Ko/Otsu are now 0.3 ABOVE IT IN BR
Ive gone so far beyond being mad that I just started laughing hysterically when I read it.
12 Likes
Red text is moderator only thing
No its july compression reality
he said mig29smt…
It’s International Orange/Международный оранжевый (ff4f00)
Vehicle: BMPT and BMPT-72
Gamemode: Ground (all modes)
BR Change: 11.7 —> 12.3
Reason: Both vehicles are absolutely absurd at their BR. They have better armor and survivability than MBT’s at their own BR, they have fantastic firepower for both surface to surface and surface to air engagements, they HEAVILY outclass all other IFV’s, and through preferential modelling have been rendered all but immune to the only thing that could theoretically kill them in hulldown positions (a perfectly placed shot to one of the 30mm belts causing a cookoff). They also have both redundent 30mm and ATGM launchers, and somehow not a single piece of fire control electronics in the turret, making it nearly impossible to incapacitate the vehicles firepower in a single shot, unlike functionally every single other ground vehicle in the game.
It is quite frankly ridiculous that another blatantly overpowered russian ground vehicle, much like the BMP-2M and 2s38 that preceeded it, is being passed up for a BR increase simply because the vehicle is wildly overplayed, keeping its stats a bit lower due to the consistently poor skill level of the average player spamming it out.
Both vehicles are the scourge of the ground battles matchmaker from 10.7+ and the less vehicles and players that are subjected to playing against these, the better.
Just to prove how insane the current BR placement is, it is currently possible (and with how much these vehicles are spammed out, quite likely) to fight the BMPT’s in the first M1. The one armed with the 105mm gun, firing M774 with sub 400mm of pen, that doesnt even have improved turret armor of every other M1 variant ingame…
11 Likes
I would use the Su-30SM2 as a better example since the GE can atleast use MCM tactics against the Rafale.
Apparently, I didn’t save the corrected version of the text, and it remained the same as for the MiG-29SMT. However, due to the fact that the images were no longer displayed, it was not noticed.
Thank you for your vigilance!
Su-30SM doesn’t stand a chance? Arguably is better than it.
Leaving out the best plane in the game, Su-30SM2?