Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

my point stands, su-7b simply has more advantages to simply just drop it to 9.0. Thing can outrun the entire opposition and hang for days and when your only choice to catch a competent su-7b is to dodge rolands and kill him on takeoff, that’s not very balanced.

all aircraft are killable
unless its an ariete
we all hate arietes

1 Like

some more than others.

The average is around 0.5 or 0.6 though, that is a result of how the game works.

Still killable.

as expected from design differences

Frankly if the “counter to X plane” is “wait for him to screw up” that’s where you lost the plot

a result of not bothering to learn how to play

It’s actually a result of every bomber and their mom flying straight to bases, dropping bombs, and then dying because they are mouth breathers

1 Like

No, the result of there being no respawns in ARB and respawns being limited in GRB

many tools exist to kill an su7 within the 8.0-9.0 range

being bad is fixable and not the games fault

The “unkillable su7” when the AA20 approaches at Mach 2

1 Like

8.0 planes don’t have AA.20s

didn’t know 8.0 meteors and venoms have nords

It’s almost like the su7 doesn’t see 8.0 how crazy is that

so what
8.3s and 8.7s plenty

I think thats the only one available in the 8.7 area to kill the Su7 i wouldnt imagine someone killing an Su7 with an Aim-9B

we forgetting we have someone here advocating that it drops back down to 9.0 and see 8.0?

The arguement is that @CommunistBalls wants the Su-7B to go to 9.0, meaning it would see 8.0s