Proposed change of G-91Y: 9.0 > 9.3 should not happen.
It is inferior in general peformance to Cl-13B and outright worse than the F4D, this plane is fine at 9.0 and does not need to be uptiered into stuff like the Mig-21SMT/MF, J35XS, F-8E, who all have far superior flight performance and missiles, it should also not have to face stuff like the A-10 and Su-25 with all aspect missiles.
It also makes no sense why this plane should be the same BR as the Ariete, Mig19S/Mig19PT/F-106/F101 and many other 9.3’s that simply blow it out of the water performance wise.
Requested change: Leave the G.91Y at 9.0, it does not need to be uptiered to fight planes that it has very little to no counterplay against.
Su-30MKV and MKK STILL not going up?
It’s blatant enough at this point that you, the devs, are handholding those vehicles while throwing the balance completely out of the window.
Thank you, really.
What are your statistics and are they in the room with us right now?
We’ve been speaking about the removal of the Ho-Ri being within our general considerations for at least 2 years at this stage. Along with the advanced notice now (giving people plenty of chance to obtain them), there is no “FOMO” here.
Its something many players have requested we address.
Is there any relationship between 37mm APHE and 57mm APHE?
In addition, Gaijin has also approved the report on the lack of APHE for PGZ88 on the issue channel
Indiscriminately reloading speed buffs are genuinely foolish.
In truth, the real appeal of World War II combat lies in its slow pace.
WT is a vehicle game, not FPS.
Mode : Ground Realistic
Vehicle : AMX-32
BR change : 9.7 > 9.3
Reason : It’s not really mobile , the gun handling isn’t particulary good , armor wise it’s just auto-canon proof , if anything it’s just a Leopard 1a5 with a 20mm but worse shell.