It’s the consequence of purposely uptiering those Sherman 75 mm tanks. It’s pretty self explanatory.
Your reasoning isn’t good justification to prevent IS-2 and KT from moving down.
10 years later. Fair tho. Is there more?
The AMX’s are fine where they are, the issue is the 1A5’s have no business at 9.0
Air realistic
Mystere IVA
8.7->8.3
It has more engine power than earlier variants but at the same time I believe is heavier, counteracting it quite a bit. Barely anyone plays these for good reason.
AIR SIMULATOR
Ki-84 Ko 5.0 → 5.7
Not only is it way too strong at 5.0, but it’s also not enough of a downgrade from Otsu model (5.7 Air Sim) to warrant being so much lower.
Ah, so you keep backtracking. What other “meta” is there in your book? If MCM is only one of them, there must more metas where the EFT doesn’t beat the GE
Air realistic
Mig 21 smt
10.3->10.7
Pls get the flare+high g missile + supersonic combination out of 10.3. Any time you are full uptiered vs these the fun is just gone; they were previously 10.7 with no issue.
Vehicle: AMX-32 (105)
Mode: Ground RB
Change: 9.3 → 9.0
Reason: There is no justification for this to be any higher BR than the leo 1a5. It trades worse firepower, worse mobility and absolute terrible sights for a 20mm.
Just keep increasing all the fighter BR’s and lowering the bomber BR’s, except for the T18B, in Arcade Air and you will soon reach your goal of having P-40’s going up against B-52’s…Your hatred for the Nippon Empire planes above Tier II is obvious and you have basically destroyed that tree, why not finish it and just remove all the Nippon Empire planes from Tiers III and IV…It is ridiculous to have a prop plane from the 1943 era of WW II facing Korean War era jets, some of which are radar and missile equipped and twice as fast, facing each other…It doesn’t matter the turn rate, which by your own description is worse than previous models…
Thats scraping it lol
AIR SIMULATOR
Spitfire LF Mk9 (all) 5.0 → 5.7
Likewise with Ki-84 Ko, it is way too strong at 5.0 and completely ruins playing anything else at this BR. Air Simulator battles at 5.0 become extremely boring and just devolve into a sea of LF Mk9s, it’s very unfun to play.
this are all bad changes and should be reverted
That’s fair for the A-7E (tbh idk why A-7D and E are same BR rn) but I don’t see any issue with Aim-9Js at 9.3.
J35xs
Air realistic
10.3->10.7
Just like the mig 21 SMT, it’s combination of weaponry countermeasures and insane missiles are too good for 10.3, even if it ends up one of the worst 10.7. The low countermeasure count isn’t unplayable like some people might exaggerate.
General Rule of Thumb for Vehicle Rank Placement Based on BR
To keep rank progression logical and consistent, I suggest assigning ranks based on BR as follows:
- BR 3.7 → Rank III
- BR 6.0 → Rank IV
- BR 7.3 → Rank V
- BR 8.7 → Rank VI
- BR 10.3 → Rank VII
- BR 12.0 → Rank VIII
- BR 13.0+ → Rank IX
Note: Premium vehicles should follow the same rule and have their ranks adjusted whenever their BR changes. They are not to be exempt!
Rank Changes
- Turm III — Rank V → VI
- T58 — Rank V → VI
- M728 — Rank V → IV
- Pz.Bef.Wg.VI (P) — Rank IV → III
- Sturmtiger — Rank IV → III
- Ru 251 — Rank IV → V
- Centurion Mk.5 AVRE — Rank V → IV (swap with Action X)
- Centurion Action X — Rank IV → V (swap with AVRE)
- Type 75 MLRS — Rank V → IV
Reason: Their current ranks no longer match their BRs.
BR Suggestions & Placement in Tech Tree
Wyvern S.4 — No change.
It has already received multiple FM nerfs and is no longer dominant at 5.0.
T20 — No change.
Its statistics are inflated because it is mainly played by experienced players. A wider player base will lower its average performance.
Type 75 MLRS — 7.0 → 6.0
A niche vehicle with poor mobility and limited effectiveness that doesn’t justify its current BR.
F-14A IRIAF — No Change
The radar is weak, Fakour’s can be easily notched and chaffed, no all-aspect irccm missiles, not good aircraft performance for a 13.7. It only has the Fakour 90’s–to be more specific just the acceleration of the missile going for it, otherwise the aircraft and its weapons aren’t competitive any higher then 13.3. Fakour’s catches people off guard cuz they overextend and don’t turn cold to defend.
F-4E Kurnass 2000 — 12.3 → 12.0
Its a F-4E airframe without fox-1, fox-3, and without irccm fox-2 missiles & total x6 missiles at 12.3, fighting against F-15, F-16, F/A-18s, MiG-29, Su-27. The F-4EJ Kai atleast has fox-1 and total x8 missiles.
Zero series — No change.
Their strength comes from enemy players choosing to turn fight. They are slow and already struggle against faster aircraft. The higher BR they are placed the speed gap will be more profound and they Zeros already are balanced aircraft.
General Bombers & non-radar SPAA — Consider BR reductions.
Many have limited battlefield impact and underperform at their current BRs.
Su-17M2/M4 (USSR) — Folder them and place behind Su-25T.
Su-7B/BKL — Place them behind Su-25.
Yak-130 — Place infront of Yak-38.
MiG-29 (9-12/9-13) — Folder them.
Placement of Fw 190 series at rank 3 & 4 ;
- Folder Fw 190 D-9 with D-12 at rank-IV.
- Folder Fw 190 A-5, A5/U2, A5/U12 together and place infront of A-4 at rank-III, defolder from A-4.
- Fw 190 F-8 switch positions with Me-410 B-6/R3.
Do-217 N-1/N-2 — Place them at rank-I infront of Do-217J’s.
Do-217 K-1/M-1 — Folder with Do-217 E2/E4 at rank-III.
Miscellaneous
Strike Aircraft & Bombers — Give a 300-500 m air spawn above the airfield.
Modern Air RB maps are larger, players are more experienced, missiles appear earlier, and fighters often reach targets first while carrying similar payloads. A small air spawn would improve their viability without making them overpowered.
JF-17 — Redesignate to Fighter.
MiG-27 (all) — Redesignate to Strike Aircraft.
M18 Hellcat (all) — Redesignate to TD.
No su30 premium nerf is despicable
ATGMs drops because of Gaijin’s fake reallistic ATGM behavior, and your proposed reload buff would be just unrealistic.
While I do agree that ATGM is awful to use I still think it’s capable for 8.0 the moment Gaijin fixes it’s ATGM.
Vehicle: AMX 32 (120)
Mode: Ground RB
Change: 9.7 → Same BR as AMX 32 (105)
Reason: The larger cannon does not justify it being any higher than the 105 variant, there is not practical difference. They should be at the same BR just like the AMX 30b2 and brenus.