Soon the A6M5 Ko will meet the Su-30MKK in battle.
The fact that those Su-30 are still at 13.3 after almost a year is absurd. They can meet planes that have 4 sparrows and that’s it in their kit, ffs.
3 Likes
okay bro is just living in fairy tail land where the yak 130 dont exist
Dude can’t use MCLOS AGMs, so he thinks nobody else can
Just the Yak??? What about all the A-4, the Albatross and all the aircraft that can carry bullpops
It uses the SM engine currently, it’s just that the SMT alone uses the unique R-13F-300 rather than the normal R-13-300 like MiG-21MF does which is an export version of SM. How about R-60s and R-13M1s?
1 Like
Hey. Only russia is bad here.
Bot
/s
am lazy to refrence more planes yak 130 came to mind first cause it made me mald today
Vehicle: Strela-10M/M2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 10.3 —> 10.7
Add the 9M333
9M333
Whilst it is quite good, by itself I don’t think it requires a BR increase, therefore the 9M333 should be added to it, which would be slightly better
Optionally, overload could be increased to 40G’s 9M37 overload
3 Likes
Awh cmon (It was a jokepost anyway) still buff it plz
Vehicle: Su-30MK2 AMV/Su-30MKK
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 13.3 —> 13.7
The Su-30MK2/MKK overperform at 13.3 and are far closer in effectiveness to current 13.7 aircraft.
Their combination of a 10-air-to-air missile loadout (6 ARH + 4 IR) , modern radar, HMD, IRST, and strong overall performance gives them a significant advantage over other 13.3 fighters. While heavier than other Flankers, the flight performance tradeoff is not enough to justify the lower BR.
The main issue is matchmaking. At 13.3 they frequently face 12.3-12.7 aircraft with substantially weaker sensors, fewer missiles, and inferior to no BVR capability. Moving them to 13.7 would reduce oppressive downtiers while placing them against aircraft with comparable overall combat capability, creating a truly miserable experience at these BRs.
17 Likes
Or just leave it as it is? The 2S6 is at 10.7
That’s a Skyhawk, as I already mentioned.
That came in the last major update, as I already mentioned.
You mean the A-4B? A skyhawk? A plane I already mentioned?
Tbf the SK-60B and Bucanneer also exist, but they’re not even close to being oppressive.
The plane added in the most recent update which I already mentioned?
Also I find it incredible that building the unique gun doesn’t qualify as being close to reality. It’s not a completed chassis to be sure, but the fact that the gun was built and tested says a lot.
Let’s not forget how Gaijin figured out how to arm the Yak 141. Realizing the Ho-Ri II, around a gun that was tested, with drawings thats exist, shouldn’t be more difficult than figuring out which weapons would be on the Yak 141 or how the nonexistent radar would impact the flight characteristics.
3 Likes
Maw ? Where the fuck did you get that
Vehicle: SIDAM 25
Br: 8.0 - 7.3
Reason: Italy lacks a solid SPAA at this BR while many nations have one. This would fill a gap while leaving the ZSU-23-4V to continue and fill the 8.0 spot. If the APDS belt is the reason for the current BR placement then simply remove the belt similar to how the falcon and AMX 30 S DCA was treated.
2 Likes
They honestly might as well get rid of TTs at this rate
Next thing you know they’ll give the British tree Canada as well
Where did you mentioned them? You said there is no CAS problem st 7?0-10.0 and I told you one of the most broken CAS planes in this br bracket you said, and not only the A-4 can carry the bullpops they are many more
Really different spaa for different engagements
YAK 3U AIR RB
5.7->6.3
im tired of this seal clubber prop being undetiered it literally out energys every prop below 10K feet in a 1v1 dogfight its literally a super prop has zero right to face 4.7 props
1 Like
Yea Strela is fine as it is no need to change it, maybe a different variant in a folder