Please do not use red colored text.
1 Like
It has 4 TV bombs
one of the best flight models of the bracket
solid gun (albeit low ammo count)
there are almost no aircraft or SAMs that can shoot down a good yak-130 pilot
It is broken
Bullpup carriers are also broken (like the A-4E)
They can engage SPAAs way outside their engagement range, and those with TV bombs also have F&F munitions
They’re untouchable for SPAAs.
It is widely agreed, for very good reason that the yak-130 is broken. Vehicles like the A-4E are also broken in a similar way.
You’re just abusing pure skill issue in order to spread horrible takes
Stop it.
Spoiler
Just rename yourself to TIGER_TANK_2 atp
1 Like
AMX and Super Etendard need a lower br in Ground battles
11.0-> 10.7
Reason:
many vehicle especially Russian ones have fnf weapons at this br. Laser guided weapons just aren’t meta/ useful in this current state of the game plus they are both subsonic. The AMX was 10.7 before and it wasn’t OP by any means. The Etendard does get access to the AS-30L Nord but trades thermals for that compared to the AMX.
Maybe add a foldered AMX with access to Ophir IR guided bombs bc they used them :)
1 Like
just turn and irccm avoided
none of them are long range
Mistral at 9.3 is fine
My money’s on them dropping su35/f15ex/whatever for minor nations at 15.0 with some whacky new missiles and god tier flight performance in December so the entire 14.0-14.7 becomes scorched earth.
And 14.0 premiums for good measure.
1 Like
From my LAV-AD experience, that rarely works.
What exactly is long range to you? I consider missiles that can be fired beyond visual range to be long range.
No.
Neither one of them should move down in BR
Other vehicles with superior capabilities should move up
Also lacks ATAS missiles
From my experience dodging LAV-ADs it works great.
if you look at the 85mm cannon for russia it can pen the JUMBOs front plate at point blank range cause of normalization. but if you to the higher velocity more powerful 88MM of tiger 1 it cannot
the 122mm cannon with the non post war round should not be penning a panther at 1000meters or more
added thanks
huh?
it can?
6km is not beyond visual range
And turning to avoid slow pull missiles is pretty easy you just gota like roll and stuff more then up and down u know?
Ground RB/AB
T58
8.7 → 9.0
or
8.7 → reload change from 2.6 to 5.0
this vehicle broke the entire bracket of BR around it, it should have never came to the light with 2.6 seconds of reload with a Hesh that oneshots you in whatever point of the tank that it touches at all, if BMPT got rightfully nerfed, this shall as well
the overlap of the turret plates is also buggy but that’s not the matter
1 Like
yeah it can
If it can dodge an aim9b, it can dodge a stinger. And if you really can’t dodge more than one, you break LOS while dodging the first one so they can’t send another, then close the distance and gun them. Or you can use the CCRP that f84s get to toss a 2000lb bomb at them from well outside their range.
The sight was already locked directly on it at the start of the video
Its also disingenious to assume all SPAAs will always play perfectly making 0 mistakes. A cas player who plays perfectly making no mistakes will NEVER die to a manpads spaa.
Vehicle: AMX A-1A
BR Change on Air Realistic: 11.0 to 10.3
BR Change on Ground realistic: 11.3 to 10.3
Explanation: The AMX A-1A should have its BR lowered on both game modes. With only 2 air-to-air missiles that have basically zero flare resistance and a lower burn time than the AIM-9L, on ARB at 11.0 it is outclassed since every plane carries more and/or better missiles , it is even outclassed by other strike aircrafts like the “A-10A Late” with 4 AIM-9Ls, and the “SU-25T” with 2 R-60Ms and 2 R-73s, not to mention the ammount of countermeasures and the power of the cannons.
On ground RB the situation is even worse, at 11.3 it faces AA systems that it has no chance of avoiding like the Tor-M1 and ADATS since it carries no guided missiles like, for example, the A-10A Late at 10.7 with 6 AGM-65Ds and the GAU-8/A.
Placing the AMX at 10.3 would put it on the same BR as other premium strike aircrafts like the SU-25K and the A-10A, the AMX would have the edge on speed, manouverability and a better targeting system, but the A-10 and SU-25 have more survivability with more countermeasures, sturdier airframe and guided missiles.
And for the love of God, give it the LITENING III that it should have had from day 1
6 Likes
Comet needs some serious changes. It’s such a sad vehicle to play.
Firstly, it simply needs to go all the way down to 4.7. It is inferior to the Firefly in every regard except forward speed and turning. The only reason it’s 5.3 in the first place because it has an APDS that you primarily won’t be using. Italy even has a Firefly with APDS and that’s lower at 5.0!
In real life, the Canadians developed a better APDS that solved accuracy issues too.
They need their exhaust muffles added. Gaijin changed smoke from the less obvious dark grey to bright white purely so aircraft can spot them easier and as a result, the Comet spews out a chimney of smoke that puts it on par with the Admiral Kuznetsov. In reality the Comet covered the exhaust which pushed the smoke down to conceal it.
And finally, the Finnish Comet is incorrectly modelled. In reality they received post war modified Comet’s which included turret mounted smoke launchers and fish tail exhausts on the rear. At the most, both the British and Finnish Comet are early pre Normandy invasion hulls with post war turrets without any of the post war modifications. It’s like Gaijin has intentionally made the Comet as insufferable as possible.
5 Likes
Panther D is already 5.3. And the worse perform make it a good candidate to move down specially since movility nerf. Moving to 5.7 and rank 3 is far from be a problem.
Could honestly be 10.7. Compared to the mi28n at 11.0 it’s quite bad and even compared to the G lynx it severely lacks in the defensive armaments.
1 Like