Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

[Батончик]

@Sanguisage

I think it’ll be 14.3 with pl-12a and later update to pl-15 whenever they feel like adding something more. Maybe pl-17 as well idk about that missiles compatibility though.

Yes, that would be nice

@Sanguisage

Also, what makes j-11bg lower br than bgh when both of them are essentially the same airframe if I remember correctly with their only difference being one for air force and one for navy

Because:

@Батончик

Btw, I forgot about the naval version of the 11BG.
Then one J-11 as 14.0 with PL-12, and the second as 14.3 with the PL-12A

I think it would be useful to have two J-11s with AESA in the TT at different BR with different PL-12 version

[genises1o]

yeah BHG and BG are the same par camo

[Батончик]

sad
I thought they already installed WS10B

[genises1o]

it was a testbed that only ever had WS-10A afaik

it might be lighter because its a complete redesign afaik but this is me speculating

[Батончик]

Then the J-11D is useless for the TT

[Батончик]

I thought this was on MK2
Well, anyway, MK2 for TT with RVV-SD and wide frequency YJ-91 would be an interesting addition for Nuclear Thunder

---

In addition, it must have an ASM, unlike an MKK

[Sanguisage]

@Батончик

I think it would be useful to have two J-11s with AESA in the TT at different BR with different PL-12 version

Maybe can, but I doubt this will happen though…(I might be proven wrong)

@Батончик

Then the J-11D is useless for the TT

I hope will be cool event plane in the next few years, just as a collectors item.

[Clangokkuner]

I went and asked a rather reputable person about it, seems to just be an RVV-AE

[genises1o]

is RVV-SD, you can tell by the rear

SD is rounded
AE is flat

Shenyang J-11, J-16, J-15, History, Performance & Discussion

I mean [image] The PLAAF appears to have no plans to integrate additional IR missiles for the Su-30MKK, particularly during the late stage of their service life.

[ron_23]

that is a normal r77 after looking at the image

the nozzle is too big releative to the missile to be a RVV-SD

it might look like a 77-1 bc of the perspective

not like this really matters anyways since we all know that gaijin dosent want to give the Su-30MKK the 77-1

[nesandınAMRAAM]

Hello, Did KJ8602 always had ±30 coverage? Wasn’t that -+45 or do i remember wrong?

[genises1o]

was changed last major only J-10C and J-15T were spared (also reason why the 10C´s RWR was renamed)

@Stona_WT

KJ8602 (all variants) radar warning receiver — the vertical coverage limits have been reduced from -45°/+45° to -30°/+30°. C and D bands have been added to the list of visible bands. Source: China Precision Export catalogue, KJ8602 Radar Warning Receiver Series; 新时代的歼—7 歼—7MG、歼—7MF.

[Clangokkuner]

Deino said it’s the RVV-AE and I’m inclined to believe him, given that he’s literally a professional at this

[ron_23]

the RVV-AE is the export version of the R-77

that is exactly what i have been saying

the RVV-SD is the export version of the R-77-1

[Dzhkグ]

J-16 vs Egyptian Raf Footage

[genises1o]

cool footage ngl

Spoiler

too bad i dont understand chinese to get what they are saying

[xef56]

question is who won

[Dzhkグ]

In the long term probably China since they got more information on how the Rafale flies.

The dogfight? idk.

[genises1o]

egypt found out that a flanker related airframe flies like a flanker

[genises1o]

unrelated question: is there any info on the IRST´s used on the chinese planes ingame as all of em are MIg-29 9.12 copies iirc