I hope they do actually get fixed, but it being Gaijin i would also not be surprised if they kept it in bug report hell
maybe but i am psure we couldnt prove it if we wanted too (and the other versions ingame i am psure are too heavy already anyway iirc)
Community Bug Reporting System ([DEV] J-16 Cockpit X-ray Model Mismatch)
Community Bug Reporting System ([DEV] J-16 Pylons Visible Without Weapons)
On another note, PL-12A’s are currently mounted on legacy PFT12 pylons, but the one time we saw them mounted on a plane irl, they were mounted using the newer PFT15 which the PL-15 also uses. Do you guys think it’d be worthwhile to report this and get the pylons they use visually changed? The J-16 already has nodes for the PFT15, so the change would take very little time.
For those of you wondering, this is what the PFT15 looks like on the J-16 in-game (Some of the pylons are floating but that can be bug reported, and yes, the J-16 has unused double racks but that does not mean anything)
i think this only suggestion
if you do also have like a paper saying that pylon can carry pl 12 then yes it is
yeah actually im wrong its more of a suggestion
Cockpit canopy accepted
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wyW3kW5AEp7u
AKF98A accepted (suggestion)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/LkHM3D42UwES
Can’t wait to use these in Nuke Thunder.
I assume Gaijin is just gonna copy + paste the JSOWs onto the J-16 (considering how they treat CN stuff).
This is an analogue of Storm Shadow, this missile
even better.
I hope there will be some details about it this year
While it may be a stealth cruise missile, there is no information to assume its any where near a StromShadow analoge, more likely to JASSM.
More likely they’ll just copy what’s available of the CM-98 considering they look pretty much identical.
So Stormshadow but less range and smaller warhead. Probably about it



wasn’t the pl-12 missing like 100 m/s of delta v
the issue was then marked as nab but i’m still coping super hard
maybe idr really but could very well be
Why does the J-16 have the same fuselage drag as the Su-30SM2? I know they are both twin-seat, but wouldn’t the canards add drag?
I am curious if anyone know where haijin sourced that the WS-10B has 137.8kN thrust. I have not found any sources matching that number in installed thrust, the source by janes (which if i am not wrong gaijin does not let you source in a bug report) gets the figure as 135kN, whilst I also see numbers in the ranges up to 144kN. I just want to know where the number gaijin uses comes from.






