Vehicles being incorrect is reason to talk about this stuff.
In this case, Leclerc is incorrect, thus we’re here to talk about what’s provably incorrect and what isn’t.
@PompousMagnus
Being good or bad doesn’t mean you cannot seek vehicles being as correct as possible.
This game is unique.
And honestly, dismissing stuff doesn’t help.
Its A VIDEO GAME what do you mean correct? This is peak lunacy.
Being good at something means you have competency doing that thing and have optimal strategies in order to do that thing at a high level. You would not take medical advice from a doctor with 24 malpractice suits or got a medical degree in Timbuktu, just the same as you would not listen to game analyses from players who suck at a game. Talking about if a game is fun is one thing anyone can do because it doesnt require you do have any knowledge of the games meta or optimal play style ect ect… However talking about meta and optimal gameplay (which this thread is) is 100% based on your skill and game knowledge, hence why being good at that game lends your credibility. I really dont understand why this has to be explained.
Im honestly sick of the constant crying about muh historical accuracy when you drive around in third person and CAN RESAPWN.
Bruh what the F is going on here? from Leclerc need buff to stats show off?
Well but there something I know for sure Leclerc armor need fix fuel tanks explosion are BS need to be fix and down reload time to like 5sec maybe improve the experience playing Leclerc.
Not sure you can conclude anything based on skills/stats when french mains have to get all the way up there with unstabilized cannons! And the reward for all these efforts is the Leclerc, so I understand the frustration.
French vehicles in general are not designed to perform in the type of combat we have in the game. And it also doesnt take the confort of the crew into account, which is a game changer in real life.
I am a newbie at top tier, just starting to play a bit with the leclerc sometimes, my stats are pretty bad I guess for poor decision making and also for the vehicle is not competitive in CQC as it is.
-_-
4 Leclercs, 2 CAS of separate SP cost types, and a Crotale system SPAA.
IFVs are in development & will take time. Obviously light tanks AMX-10RC is the last one that I’m aware of. Though we have the ATGM car as well. So yeah, we’re just missing the autocannon recon cars, which will be worse than the Leclercs in combat effectiveness, but will be fun.
I can take 4 Abrams out and have an F-16C / functional helicopters / Support vehicles, US is just missing an air system but you’re not fighting the F-16C so the ADATs will do.
This is straight up false, there are a LOT of vehicle they can get, light vehicles specifically:
EBRC Jaguar
Vextra 105
Vextra POLE
VBCI CTA40 with Spikes
VBCI Philoctète
Just saying, and there are even more, without even counting the vehicles @ARK_BOI suggested as well, that should’ve deserved to come in the game together with the German Wiesels.
Wareta, what I said cannot be false as I was talking about my knowledge of tested vehicles, in this case light tanks.
I specified very carefully “as far as I know tested” because I haven’t done much research.
I thank you for the provided Vextra 105 & POLE, which are the two tested light tanks you listed; I appreciate it.