Oh ok.
KMBD & Cockerill BTR-3E (CSE 90LP)
BTR-3RK
KMDB BTR-3E1 (implemented)
Malaysian T-84 (Object 478DU8)
PT-91M Pendekar
2 Likes
On thank you 😊
Such a beauty
Ukrainian T-64E concept
At a glance:
- Type: Main battle tank
- Status: Experimental/prototype
- Year: ~2010
- Crew: 3
- Combat weight: 42.7 tonnes
- Engine: 5TDFE 5-cylinder diesel
- Power: 850 hp
- Power-to-weight: 19.9 hp/t
- Top speed: 65 km/h
- Range: ~500 km
- Main gun: 125 mm KBAZ smoothbore
- Ammunition: 37 rounds, 28 in the autoloader
- Reload rate: ~6–8 rounds/min
- ATGM: Kombat
- FCS: Modernized 1A33-1 Ob
- Rangefinder/sight: 1G42M
- Gun stabilizer: 2E42
- ERA: Duplet
- Soft-kill protection: Varta
- Active protection: Zaslon
- Coaxial MG: 7.62 mm KT-7.62
- Remote weapon: 12.7 mm KT-12.7
- Additional weapon: twin 23 mm GSh-23L
- Additional weapon: AGS-17 automatic grenade launcher
- Auxiliary power unit: 10 kW
11 Likes
Kraz Shrek with a Sarmat module
6 Likes
Demo of how Ukrainian era “Nizh” works
5 Likes
3 Likes
hey guys, i was bored and decided to make a Ukrainian ground tree but its just western vehicles
let me know if there should be any changes
(edit)
Bradley moved down to 9.7
PT-91 moved up to 10.7
Hibneryt moved up to 7.3
added CV9035NL
added flags
removed m1128
added Leopard 1A5 (c3105)
added M1A1AIM-BV
added Scimitar
added BVP M80A
added BWP-1M Puma
4 Likes
also to the creator of the original tech tree, the T-64-E should be at least 12.0 because it has gen 3 thermals, APS, and advanced ERA
Raise up the PT-91 to 10.7 please
Hibneryt to 7.3
done
1 Like
Id suggest adding some more Leopard 1A5’s re-equipped with new turrets, Leopards with SkyRanger 35 are already in use for air defense, and Cockerill 3105 undergo trials with potential for more deliveries.
Leopard 1A5 (C3105)
Leopard 1A5 (SR35)
3 Likes
This things armor is even worse than I assumed
Can you not list things that it never mounted, there’s practically zero way Gaijin would be kind enough to add these things that never came to only existing proto of T-64E (iirc today it doesnt even exist as it was converted back to T-64B, or so I heard)
Also there’s zero chance it’s that light given current in game T-64BV is missing a ton of weight and T-64BM weights 45 tons.
KBAZ gun doesnt exist either, it’s KBA3 as in number 3.
1 Like
I mean, Duplet was mounted as far as I am aware (T-64E being the only T-64 ever trialed with it)?
As for the other systems, if no photos of them being mounted exist, then yeah, it’s wrong to see them there.
TBH it wouldnt even make a difference given Duplet is just Nizh with different materials used to form the jet cones
Uh, am I missing something out, because “Duplet” is like Oplot’s armor array whereas 2x Nizh layers used instead of one
That’s talking about containers they’re in, which isnt even mounted here. As far as explosive elements wise the only difference there is the one i listee.
Also Oplot doesnt use Nizh.
Nizh is HSChKV-34 and HSChKV-19, meanwhile Duplet is that but with P and some other letter. Those letters signaling that materials are different.
1 Like
Well, I am just saying that the Nizh module has one layer of KhSChKV-34 insert, whereas Duplet has 2x KhSChKV-34 inserts in combined armor package.
Maybe I worded it the wrong way, but “Nizh” module is just one layer of ERA while Duplet is double
EDIT: I am slow cause I am on a phone and I see one thing at a time