ARI 18228/19 is the British designation for it, but it’s fairly configurable so the stats being different isn’t necessarily wrong. Not to say they’re correct
1 Like
Yep, that it should do… (though took 6 months for the FA2 to get that…)
1 Like
nevermind the hud thats still incomplete…
The FA2 is… okay… As you are usually just running missiles… its perfectly usable… The broken CCRP is annoying though, but I bomb far less in it. (It does actually get a gunsight, its buggy, but just about works , but I rarely run a gun in SB)
Its the FRS1/FRS1e not having a Gunsight which is really really needed that is driving me nuts at the moment. On top of the lack of CCRP which is something I do actually do quite often in the FRS1 (as it can actually run a base kill amount of bombs)
2 Likes
i took it out once or twice in sim and ran 2x 9L and 2x 120s and i didnt do terribly (mind you it was stock so i was playing a bit more passive)
From the trailer it looks like it got 65B, documents state 4xAGM65s can be carried
so around 10.3/10.7
1 Like
Yeah… I did a big chunk of the stock grind before it got AMRAAM stock. It would be fine bar the compression at 13.0
1 Like
What’s bugged about them?
1 Like
it’s a interesting one
(Community investigation in thread)
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zQnQiLTckFCC
All bombs (bar the PW4 wierdly) that a have a track rate of 10000d/s just go haywire when dropped from any reasonable alt
So GBU-24 is fine but GBU-54B for example doesnt work either.
So… Bring on Sea Eagles;
Buc S2
Buc S2B
Sea Harrier FRS1/FRS1e
Sea Harrier FA2
Tornado Gr1
Hawk 200
Have I missed any?
2 Likes
The things the indian navy attached it to like the jaguar, the sea king, the il-38, and the tu-142.
So we might be able to argue them on the Jag Gr1/GR1A/IS then
Jaguar IM, with Agave? radar in the nose
Seen a photo of a british jaguar with the agave on a centreline pod though. EDIT: not british explicitly, apparently it was part of the Jaguar International testing
1 Like
The basic S.2 couldn’t use them, only the S.2B.
May as well take this as an opportunity to remind everyone that the first post in this thread includes performance data on British weapons and as far as I know a comprehensive list of every British vehicle that used each weapon
5 Likes
Read the actual information on the OP? Nah… Easy now, that would be too sensible 😜
Though I’m kinda surprised by that. Was it just a timing thing?
1 Like
Well, the S2 ceased to exist in the early 70s and Sea Eagle was a mid-80s weapon. The S.2B also required modifications to be able to use it (which the S2 would not have received on account of no longer being in service).
Ah… That makes sense
My point is less so that it will be an insane dogfight, rather its that it wont piss away all its speed in one turn (i hope)
Well… We cant try out Sea Eagles yet, they arent on anything