but is agile?
is fast?
your only think of zuni… and not the picture…
when you have a YAK-9 with 37 cannon decimates you… and can really dogfight… and win…
when you have the 50canon 262 get lower… even with the BUFF last patch… that now shoots accurate…and has the speed and can run…
only zunis cant give it a stay where you are ticket… the same time the same airplane/airframe/ engine and all… AD2 gets on 5.3 … or is weak… that ? cause zunis…
so thats the problem… many of you see 1 thing not the full package having 1 good does not make it better airplane… to be on high brs the same time … that can be countered very very very very easy…
i got many of AH1 on my spit (4.7) on my zero… on my ki-84… on my even 109 k… so what is the problem… ohh has zunis…
as my experience with the AH 1 is terrible… and i prefer the F2G… when i can get one airplane out… is more effective agile and can do things… instead the AH1 be a free kill…
yesterday … i took down with ostwing 2 … the AH1 that shot at me from 1 km he did not hit me… or even did any kind of damage.
i got him. i won the fight. simple
Even then it’s going to be coming up against Rafales and AESA Typhoons - Iran claims 120 countermeasures, and a very well upgraded AWG-9 (probably made with Russian help)
TBH I’d really just rather see this & the Fakours nerfed to AIM-54C+ stats, and the plane dropped back to 13.0
IDEA return in the game ALL THOSE VEHICLES that are fake and was in the game…
and in return… DONT REMOVE THE OSTWING 2 that is fake as well… aaaa great deal? is not?
cause as far as we know… the ostwing 2 is a fake anti air and never manufactured…
and is in the tech tree and in a premium pack!!! great?!
dont remove the HO RI… and just bring back all those people want to play… and cant cause removed… status and die from them… simple as that problem solved…
the game is not realistic enough to be that accurate so …
Just because its flight performance is bad doesn’t mean it should be at low BR when it has a payload that can wipe the floor by itself. By your logic A-10A should go a whole lot lower because it’s slow… or better yet, lower the Thai L-39 to 6.3…
Arcade Battle BR: 6.7 → 6.3 (Same as planned change)
Remove BR-471D (APCBC)
Rationale
The IS-2 '44 BR decrease was long overdue, but this means the somewhat asynchronous BR-471D round from the 50’s is no longer needed. This round should be reserved for the addition of the IS-2M later down the road.
I’m still amazed they haven’t removed the AC IV for being a wooden vehicle.
This is the furthest the Aussies got to a completed vehicle. Unless you want to count the E2 17-Pdr turret test-bed, but that’s still pretty far removed from the AC IV.
Gaijin balance based on “efficiency.” This is primarily RP & SL earnings. Planes that are abused for SL grinding tend to go up unless they are bestsellers like the Su-30MKs.
They don’t really take into account what the playerbase want to see, which is:
Balancing based on capabilities
Equal BR for similar airframes with similar capabilities across trees
Nobody on the balance team looked at the Hunter F.6 increase and stopped to consider the fact that it will be defenseless against high-G and all aspect missiles while also being unable to get any missile kills when all enemies have countermeasures.
Vehicle：G91YS
Game Mode：9.3→8.7（Air RB） 9.3→8.0（Ground RB）
Reason：G91YS lack chaff and flare and its a sub-sonic so it should be 8.7 not 9.3
Since the L39（Japan） with a rocket ccip in 7.3 the G91YS should be 8.0.
Really Gaijin should remove the L23. The 900 is built off of a Mk 5/3 so never had the stowage for APFSDS, and considering they implemented it “as-is” and not “as-intended” then the round should be removed and BR reduced.
and thats what i said you see only one aspect … and not the full package…
you see the speed on A10 you dont see what carry … what can do…
does the A10 has 1 millon flares on the br.? it has… DOES HAVE the UNIQUE cannon? YES IT DOES … does has mavericks YES IT HAS… is capable to work on 10.0… NO cause AA that face are overpowered.
is the AH-1 … fast NO HELL NO EVEN ON A DIVE!!! is maneuverable? NO it dreams one day become crop duster… it has anything that you can work with … in the brs is in? depends how bad are the enemy team(aka AA that dont shoot on airplanes and w in to become a free kill.)
so where is your point… to move away with an airplane 3.7 brs higher…
you dont see that?
it has ballistic computer? NO
is fast ? NO
it can turn ? NO
it can dogfight? NO
is a free kill… YES IT IS…
and the last question that i need you to answer … how long it was the last time you saw an AH-1 in your games.? i already told you yesterday… 1 on 40 games… only yesterday… and to add on… 1 on the full month… to add more… 3 the last 5 months… so … is useful to have zunis at 6.3 with a slow airplane that has no real defense? or cant defend it self… just the zunis justified that?
1 good on that airplane can make it be in a br… that could not existed… and is dissapeared… ? and many forgot about it? is really good airplane the AH 1 cause has only zunis in the br that it is…?
the comparison you never did… was with the IA58A … why that thing instead to get straight on 6.0 and 6.3 cause has amazing rockets and is a 40$ premium sits on 4.3 and destroy everything?
is faster … more manueverable… and more agile from the AH-1 … has more engine power… is from the 70s and not from the late 40s…
and still is on 4.3…
is fair?
what do you think…
rethink the AH1 … how over br is … just for zunis… having nothing else…
and see how op is the IA58A on the 4.3 with the over powered copy zunis from the 70s that it got… from the get go…
is the IA58A the same br with the FIREBALL? can do both the same job?
fireball has 4 50cal… 2 bombs and HVAR x 4…
IA58A has … op rockets X30 has 4 cannons… and those are in the same BR and those are equal by gaijin.
imagine that … the IA58A that should be at comparable with the 40 zuni AH-1 … that is slower on higher br… if is that not BIAS what is?
what you are talking is not right… cause your excuse is just the zunis… what is.
instead to see the problem you focus on one + that the airplane in question has. thats the problem… 1 + and you are 2 brs higher than something op… that is faster and agile… amazing! how i did not thought about !!
thats the correct comparison IA58 with AH1… not A10 that has nothing to do … with the prop… and how it is…
the A10 … use the engines for stability… and accuracy that it uses “commercial” engines and not any kind of a GE 104… or J75… or something like that… they could do that yes they did not…
they wanted a fly low stable platform. thats the A10 …
At this point I don’t know why we don’t ask for Chieftain Mk 3 to be 8.3, in several ways it’s actually worse than the Olifant 1A. Olifant has APFSDS, like 40mm more penetration, and a shorter reload. It’s also got a LRF, and soon the Chieftain won’t have any range finder, even in terms of mobility the Olifant is more mobile.
The only advantage the Chieftain has at this point is simply armour.
Gamemode: All
Vehicle: Type 69-IIa
Change: Add APFDS, move to 8.7, change rank from V to VI
Reason: Despite having a laser rangefinder and smoke grenades, this is still the same TO-55, which scores a 9.3 against formidable opponents like the T-72A and KPz/MBT-70. Equipping it with APFDS rounds and up the BR would make it comparable to the T-55A—but better, and thus one tier higher.
your logic is backwards. The Su‑27SM is itself over‑tiered at 12.7 – you don’t use an inflated BR as a benchmark to raise others. I’ve already replied to Grondolf with a detailed BR strength discussion – go check that thread. By the way, mig29smt has better radar so its br is higher.
Gamemode: GRB
Vehicle: XM803
Change: up BR from 9.0 to 9.3
Reason: MBT with good mobility, LR, autoloader and good damage will be sit on the 9.3. The same thing with MBT-70/KPz-70 (the german variant have 6 sec reload time), but on the 9.7
M26/M26 T99/M26A1 (all nations)
Both modes
6.7 → 6.3
At 6.7, it has the armor and firepower of a medium tank but the mobility of a heavy tank. You have a gun that struggles frontally against enemy armor without any real tools to work around this weakness.
With the IS-2 and the early King Tigers planned to go down to 6.3 (I don’t think these changes are good), it is frankly absurd for the M26 to stay at 6.7
