Mode: Air Realistic Battle
Vehicle: Bf 109 G-14/AS
BR Change: 5.3 → 4.7
Reasoning: The G-14/AS has worse performance at 5000/6000m and lower than the Bf 109 G-6, only having better performance at higher altitudes. There is no reason to have it at 5.3, as its slower, has worse climbrate and turn than other aircraft it competes with.
3 Likes
Mode: Air Realistic Battle
Vehicle: Bf 109 G-14
BR Change: 5.3 → 4.7
Reasoning: The Bf 109 G-14 has more or less the same performance as the Bf 109 G-6. Its outclassed at 5.3, as its slower, has worse climbrate and turn than other aircraft it competes with.
2 Likes
OH BR change right after sale, well well well
Mode: Air Realistic Battle
Vehicle: Bf 109 G-10
BR Change: 5.7 → 5.3
Reasoning: The G-10 is slower and has a worse climbrate as the Bf 109 K-4, only having better performance at around 7000m and higher. Its outclassed at 5.7 as it doesnt fit the meta, where the K-4 has already a hard time to performe good.
3 Likes
M26 (all) - RB BR 6.7 → 6.3.
If Tiger 2 P gets it, Pershings should also get. it is not needed on this br due to the presence of T26E1/M26E1
5 Likes
T26E5 - RB BR 6.7 → 6.7
This tank does possess decent armor performance, but that’s not a reason to upgrade it to version 7.0. You should reduce some of its engine power or increase reload time to balance its combat effectiveness. Upgrading it to version 7.0 will drastically worsen its combat environment.
6 Likes
Those two are subsonic.
A-10 is actually slower than some prop aircraft.
It is a terrible CAS platform
Those vehicles do not carry Fox-3’s (F-16A does not have IRCCM missiles)
And mavericks are significantly worse than KH-29s.
Consistently dealing no damage or crits while KH-29 is an almost guaranteed kill while being one of the fastest air to ground missiles in the game.
1 Like
It isn’t.
Last I checked this only gets 4 mavericks if even.
Mavericks are so much worse than KH-29s it’s kinda funny
If anything, the F-16A could go up to something like 12.3.
The other American vehicles stay.
Su-30MK2/MKK can go right up to 12.7
1 Like
have a look for yourself
3.7s
Compared to T-34(1940):
3.1 seconds Quicker reload (Almost half)
60% more penetration (with the shell everyone uses)
Stabilised
Almost double the verticle speed
much higher top speed
Higher HP/T (Acceleration)
nearly 2.5x more gun depression
1 more crew member
access to Smoke grenades
Neutral steering
better ballistics
half the reverse speed
Worse Armour
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
Compared to Pz IV G:
1.9 seconds Quicker reload (soon to be 1 second)
Stabilised
2.5x the verticle speed
50% more horisontal speed
much higher top speed
9 more HP/T (better Acceleration)
2 degrees more gun depression
neutral steering
much better hull side armour
much beter turret front armour
no cupola APHE/HE magnet
half the reverse speed
Worse frontal Hull Armour
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
worse pen
Compared to M4/M4A1
1 second Quicker reload
20% more penetration
2.5x the vertical speed
much higher top speed
Higher HP/T (Acceleration)
2 degrees more gun depression (M4)
access to Smoke grenades
Neutral steering
better ballistics
Marginally better side armour
1 mph worse reverse speed 1.5x slower
Worse turret and frontal hull Armour (M4A1s is marginally better, M4 is notably better)
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
No .50 Cal
4.0s
Compared to M4A2
1 second Quicker reload
20% more penetration
2.5x the vertical speed
much higher top speed
Higher HP/T (Acceleration)
2 degrees more gun depression
Neutral steering
better ballistics
65% worse reverse speed 1.5x slower
Worse Armour
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
No .50 Cal
Compared to T-34 (1942)
2,5 seconds Quicker reload
27% more penetration (with the shell everyone uses)
Stabilised
2.5x the verticle speed
much higher top speed
Higher HP/T (Acceleration)
nearly 2.5x more gun depression
1 more crew member
access to Smoke grenades
Neutral steering
better ballistics
half the reverse speed
Worse Armour
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
compared to Pz IV H
1.9 seconds Quicker reload (soon to be 1 second)
Stabilised
2.5x the verticle speed
50% more horisontal speed
much higher top speed
10.5 more HP/T (better Acceleration)
2 degrees more gun depression
neutral steering
no cupola APHE/HE magnet
half the reverse speed
Worse frontal Hull Armour
no APHE *(can be rectified with addition of M86)
worse pen
no AA Machinegun (minor)
at 4.0 the margins of the Cromwell’s benefits are reduced in most cases unless a specific figure was given
(gun can be given more pen by the addition of the correct 6pdr Mk.V as i suggested)
and the lack of APHE can be rectified by the addition of M86 (would require a further BR increase probably, like the Cromwell V has seen, 3.3, then 3.7, then got APHE, then proposed to 4.0 in the current changes)
with the evidence above, and personal experience, I do think the Cromwell I is a 4.0 worthy vehicle, but i’d be very happy to see its correct 6pdr cannon
in addition to the fact that the Cromwell I trades APHE compared to the Cromwell V,
1.1 ton less weight,
a stabiliser
2.5x the verticle speed
17% more pen
better ballistics
1 Like
12.7 still unplayable. Still don’t understand why we need to fight against fox3 missiles with fox 1 missiles. It totally unfair.
1 Like
where’s Yak-9k’s br nerf?
Why were the BRs of the Leopard 1A5 series buffed, but there were no buffs for the C2A1, Leopard A1A1 120/L44?
1 Like
I thought more people would complain about Khrizantema going down in BR…
The MiG-15bis ISh doesn’t have cannon CCIP and has a totally different cockpit. Of course, you can use first-person view, but if you activate zoom, there is a high chance that your aiming pip can even disappear from the screen. Super comfortable gameplay and requires zero skill, right?
1 Like
the inverse should probably happen,
Give T-90S Bhishma 3BM60, or atleast a better shell (3BM42-2 for example if the indians never got 3BM60), and fix the rest of the british 10.7s to make a good 11.0 lineup, because the T-90S is probably a little too effective at 10.7
Challenger Mk.3,
(Ready rack, make the addon kit removeable Varma protection, add NERA to UFP, )
Vickers Mk.7
(Turret protection, Thermal resolution, and the ready rack (which should be similar to what Challenger 1 should be, due to stowage similarities))
F14 iriaf > su30 is comical. Top tier is even more vulnerable at high altitude, lets see what are you going to do on next br changenges.
3 Likes
T-90S is already performing worse than other 10.7 MBTs from GB.
2 Likes
what? they did change BR for premium? ahaha they will fight with f-18 next generation fighter? crazy
Type 81 (C) - RB BR 11.7 → 11.3/11.0
This anti air simply isnt good enough to be that high, with its lack of radar and lack of smoke to defend from FnF missiles, it falls short of being considered useful especially when looking at anti airs around similar BR ratings (ADATS, Pantsir, TOR’s)
3 Likes