In game it has a 20(?)mm plate under the hull that appears to be bolted on, I assumed it was for mine protection
T26e5 going to 7.0… WHAT. One of americas only good heavy tanks going to face much better tanks than itself, while tiger II and is2 goes down??? I don’t think the nerf is needed for the t26e5, it has weak spots just like the is2 and the tiger II. Not to mention the is2 1944 having a much better cannon. so why is it going up. Keep it at 6.7
3 Likes
The 7.0 lineup isn’t available.
122mm takes 20+ seconds to reload. T26E5 is strong because of its reload. It has always had worse pen than the T34, M6A2E1. I’m neutral on the E5 going to 7.0, but don’t act like the IS-2s gun is all sunshine and rainbows.
2 Likes
Japan Me 210 - V22
- Rank : Rank II → Rank III
- Ground Realistic & Air Sim Battle: BR: 2.7 → BR 3.7
Reasoning
The Me 210 V-22 has extremely excellent performance as a Japanese attacker. Its bomb load of two SC 250s and four SC 50s is powerful. Despite that, its speed performance is not much lower than that of average Japanese fighters. An Me 210 escorted by ZERO or KI -43 is rampaging in every battle. BR 2.7 is too low.
I mean REALLY
Why on earth is the 50mm Me-262 moving down? It’s the only one that’s half decent to play currently, the 30mm planes suck and need a br drop way more than it does
1 Like
Vehicle: Me262A-1A Jabo
Mode: ground realistic
BR change: 7.0 to 6.7
Reasoning:
The only difference to the Me262A-2a event vehicle is having four Mk108 guns instead of two. While in air this may be a considerable strength, in ground mode this advantage is minimal due to the Mk108 being unable to effectively damage armoured targets.
Therefore i see no reason the A-1a Jabo shouldn’t be moved to a BR in line with the A-2a in ground realistic. It would also see more utilisation since Germany lacks an available 7.0 lineup.
The same change should also be considered for the regular A-1a which is very similar to the A-1a Jabo.
7 Likes
Yeah, i can get behind this one. Even if you have 7.0 lineup, it’s typically a poor choice compared to Horton. Not to mention the IL-28 is coming to 7.0 to give even less reason to bother. Though, i guess we also need to remember that plenty of enemy props are going up in BR to 6.0-6.7. So you wouldn’t want to compress things too much.
1 Like
Dude - seriously?
Please change this proposal to Ground RB or Arcade battles - but for an A2A role in Air RB your proposal makes zero sense. I use the German Rank III 410 A-1 at BR 3.3 frequently - and you need a hell of experience to make it work bc basically every fighter even at lower BRs outperforms you in at least 2 of the 3 main decisive points (speed, climb, turn)…
3 Likes
The Me 210 is not that different from the Me 410. While its engine power is lower, it is lighter in return. Additionally, its low-speed maneuverability is better than the Me 410’s and is in a range that can be considered comparable to the Fw 190.
It’s true that I haven’t used it in Air RB yet, so there are still many things I don’t know about it. I’ll make the revisions as you pointed out. However, it is a fact that in Ground RB and Air SB (EC) it has turned out to be a quite powerful Jabo.
Considering that it can coordinate with Japanese turn fighters, its BR needs to be estimated higher than that of the German Me 210.
That part of the game is already seriously compressed.
5.0-7.7 should be spread across more like 5 full BRs
Would be even better if the F-117 was given additional armament that was planned for the proposed F-117N. That would make it an actually meaningful aircraft.
Vehicle : Mirage 4000
Gamemode : air rb
Br : 13.0 → 12.7
Its good but it cannot compete against the gigantic amount of fox 3s jets.
5 Likes
You’re very funny.
Freccia OWS 30, GRB (10.7 → 11.0), I would love it to stay at 10.7, but I honestly don’t understand how a better Freccia with unmanned turret can sit at lower BR than 25 mm version. In my opinion either regular Freccia and KF41 should be 10.7 or OWS 30 has to go to 11.0.
Vehicle: Yak-28B
Gamemode: Air Realistic Battles
BR Change: 9.0 → 9.3/9.7
Reason: Unkillable if played passively. Lack of offensive capability is not justification for it being untouchable if it wants to in downtiers.
9.3 alongside the Buc S2 would make sense. Trades the Bucs flares for much higher speed and a gun
Especially if it gets airspawn? (genuinely dont know, buts counted as a bomber not a strike aircraft)
1 Like
I know. The vehicles are terrible. Probably the worst 9.3 vehicles you can play, but that doesn’t matter or disprove my point. What I said were that the missiles were too good, not the plane as a whole. Every aspect of a vehicle must be balanced, not just the vehicle as a whole package, otherwise we end up with AIM-9Ls at 9.7 again.
I wouldn’t want R-60s (or AIM-9Gs, or SRAAMs, etc.) in a 9.3 match if they were on an immobile SAM site
I honestly don’t mind if either of them get an air spawn to make bombing bases easier, I just don’t want supersonics at 9.0 (or 9.3 for that matter). Bucc S.2 is fine, I’d be okay with that at 9.0 even
If you agree with my suggestions remember to like them (I always like the ones from you that I agree with if I see them ;)