Both the TKX(P) and Type 90 are already significantly overtiered. They have weak darts for their BR and no meaningful armor, with their only advantage being reload speed, which is not a deciding factor in most fights.
If it would get its historically correct Engine mounted 15mm Mg 151.
The main issue with gaijinโs balancing is that they cater to the players with low skill.
That results in planes with a skill floor (or premium/squadron vehicles) being undertiered while ones that are easy to use (but not necessarily good) end up going higher.
IRIAF and Su-27SM are the perfect example of that.
Gaijin should stop catering to these people and instead focus on those who are either average or slightly above average
True, that plane should be one br step below the equivalents with HMD
Problem with 1a5 is that itโs not good enough for 9.3 and too good for 9.0
Then it should. By all the costs, it should not be seeing 1.0 planes.
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 โ> 12.0
Reason: As JH-7 at 11.7, it would be fitted for 2000D at 12.0, both 2 IRCCM missile but better air frame
5 Likes
Please fix the phantoms
1 Like
Vehicle: T-55AM-1
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.0 โ> 8.7
Reason: it is gona be in the same br with Leopard1A5. It has worse mobility and armor that canโt protect it against DM33.
1 Like
This will create a one core problem, the good plane/tank with high skill requirements became something exting because new players never gonna learn how to play this
For example the whole zero line
how likely do you think they will do that?
This and model itโs radar tail gun
1 Like
best they can do is another copy-pasted premium
1 Like
Moving forward, more sub-tree vehicles for Japan will naturally come to help bolster their ranks.
2 Likes
I think that it is very good at 9.3.
Edit: Well - It is pretty bad until itโs almost spaded.
G.91Y shouldnโt be going up in ARB when planes like the CL-13B and F4D exist at 9.0, and at 9.3 you have planes like the Su-7, F106, MiG-19s, etc, not to mention it would be able to see 10.3 which includes app aspect missiles it just shouldnโt see.
If you want to move the G.91Y up, there would need to be a lot of decompression with supersonics, otherwise youโll just end up killing a fun plane for no reason.
8 Likes
Vehicle: EC-665 Tiger UHT
Gamemode: Ground Realistis
BR Change: 12.7 โ 12.0
Reason: It has few countermeasures, lacks any DIRCM or MAWS, which makes any IR missile lethal. It has no autocannon, poor rate of climb, the tandem PARS have questionable damage and donโt always oneshot even the Pantsir, and its range is 7 kilometers (compared to 17 km for the LMURs and 16 km for the AGM-179).
4 Likes
Please explain to me where I mentioned Mystere and how you think that Mystere 4A has anything to do with my suggestion?
1 Like
If the Tiger Nr 1-50 are going down to 6.3, why shouldnt the M26 Pershings go down to 6.3??? And also if the T26E5 is going up to 7.0 it would make the most sense to also move up the Tiger II! The T26E5 was never overpowered at 6.7.
11 Likes
Vehicle: F-6C (Chinese MiG-19)
Mode: Air Simulator
Change: 9.7 โ 10.0
MiG-19 already has the most dominant flight model at 9.7, arguably to the point that it already deserves to be higher. Giving it strong missiles at a BR where many planes lack countermeasures only exacerbates this problem. It should not be the same BR as MiG-19 or J-6A either way, and 10.0 would make it a more even matchup.
1 Like