This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
“Logically” is your assumption again. Also if we go this way, j22 has 16 las guided missiles which can take out much more bots. Plus gun. At 9.0 while a6e has only las bombs and faces stronger opponents. So Im right either way.
Not only, I stated other reason as well, which is players ignorance and lack of patience.
Rank 6 can unlock su24m, su25t, mig27m/k, su17m4 - strongest pieces of ussr cas aside from su30/34.
Ad populum is quite bad argument.
But slower than f4e with 8 fnf. So is it worse than f4e?
I own su24m with even faster mitl missiles which get shot down easily even by rolands. And suffer from same bugs. So I own tram and su24 with similar mitl missiles while you own nothing.
The AH-1Z should also be bumped down to 11.7
1 Like
I appreciate the update on the pre-review of the British Phantoms.
As a counterpoint, I would like to comment that the Phantom FG.1 and Phantom FGR.2 currently offer almost no difference in their gameplay.
Why is it unreasonable to update the armament of one of these aircraft (ideally the FGR.2) with AIM-9L (+/- SuperTEMP) even if the BR has to go to 12.3 in ARB?
Based on commentary from many other rounds of BR adjustments and numerous forum topics with a lot of discussion, this would be a very popular move.
The 12.3 Phantom could always be adjusted later if its performance doesn’t hold up at 12.3.
2 Likes
f14A,Oh nice I didn’t see that one
Nothing is being ignored. We already responded earlier on the British Phantoms:
Vehicle: Yak-9k
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
Change: 5.3->5.3
Reason: Remove the APHE that has no documentation of being used by the plane, and keep it at the same BR.
5 Likes
Vehicle: Me 262 A-1a
Mode: ARB, ASB
Change: 7.0 → 6.7
The Me 262 is slow, climbs poorly, and has poor turn performance compared to every other plane at 7.0. Combine this with extremely short-ranged armament and it is one of the most outmatched fighters there is. Additionally, there are already jet fighters at 6.7 that outmatch it in every meaningful way. Especially with planes like the MiG-15 coming down to 8.0 and being matched against the Me 262 A-1a, the 262 should be moved down.
9 Likes
Agreed!
Unlike other 10.0s, it lacks:
- supersonic speed
- countermeasures
- Fox 1 missiles
Unlike the Swiss F.58 at 10.0, it has:
- weaker engine
- shorter-range Fox 2s
- no countermeasures
so SPAAs having any chance against a cas plane is bad?
when piloted by a decent player currently only strela and osa akm has even a chance to kill it and those are 10.3.
yak 130 can either evade or outrange all other SPAA around.
Thank you for looking into the issue. Something like this wouldn’t warrant an increase in the aircraft’s battle rating, as the AIM-9Ls simply aren’t as strong as they used to be.
Vehicle: C1 Ariete WAR/C1 Ariete Certezza
Mode: GRB
Change: 11.7 → 11.3
Reason: Currently at 11.7 the C1 Arietes are comparably the worst survivability MBT’s to any other MBT at that BR.
2 Likes
This, but for ALL R2Y2s since they have effectively the same performance.
You have a source for 32PDR APDS out of curiosity?
and doesn’t have the range of the gbu-39s, or the ease of use, which would simply be easier to gun at that point. I’ll get back to the grind part in a bit. only thing that makes sense here is the difference in BR competition, other than that it’s also an asumption and you again have 0 evidence a significant amount of j-22 players ground pound in ARB. “I’m right either way” [insert obama giving a medal to obama meme]
I was talking about their ARB performance clearly, not GRB in that paragraph.
absolutely terrible argument when the j22 costs $60 USD and the su-30mk2 recently went on sale for $40. absurd you couldn’t understand it without me laying it out so plainly, but hey. you really just want to insist some guy is out there ground pounding in arb using a mediocre 9.0 plane that costs $60 instead of using it where most people know what it’s good at, CAS in grb
“im right everyone else is wrong”, oh and take a look at the mirror
i dont think you know what the difference is between the numbers 1 and 5, compared to 9 and 10 at this point lmao
Amen.
1 Like
Unfortunately it would. As they are already on or above the average efficiency for their BR. AIM-9L would only increase their efficiency even more, not reduce it or keep it the same. Which would require a BR increase. So they cannot receive new missiles and stay the same BR.
2 Likes
So IS-2 1944 and Tiger 2 Nr.1-50 moving down to 6.3 and yet M26 Pershing is still 6.7?? what makes them worse than M26 Pershing?
9 Likes
I made suggestions for all three. They count as separate vehicles and must be suggested separately.
2 Likes
Vehicle : Super Etendard
Mode : Air Realistic
Change : 10.3 > 10.3 (Add something for stock aircraft)
Reason : Super Etendard probably have one of the worst stock grind at its tier. Like not even any stock bombs seriously???
5 Likes