Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Soviet MANPADS can’t do that, so NATO MANPADS obviously can’t either.
Don’t you remember?

2 Likes

Centauro II (p) should never have went to 12.3, it is literally HARD countered by bmpts with ho way of dealing with the when they are hull down.

Move this thing back down to 12.0 or even 11.7 OR give it its3/4 sec reload and give it an actually bloody chance at being niche instead of being a worse mbt.

Its no faster than most of the mbts at its own br let alone bellow.

Unfortunately as explained a couple of times now, factually this isn’t the case. The efficiency of both aircraft is on or above the average on their existing BR. So they cannot receive AIM-9L and remain at the current BR they have.

F-14 IRAF up to 13.7? What’s the justification for that

No Su-30 BR increase hahahaha can we please get a better game balance team. You really need to now stop balancing the game based on how many premiums you can sell.

3 Likes

No, I just don’t like overpowered vehicles making an entire class unplayable.

Seriously, when there’s only four playable CAS planes at 9.3, and three are Skyhawks, then you know you have a problem.

What about MKK and MK2?

6 Likes

surely premium su30s will go up in br and you just forgot to put them in, right ?

4 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT can we get a quick statement about manpad sams performance at 9.3 range from you?

Some people are obsessed with having to raise them by a whole br step if not more

6 Likes

Can you get someone from the balance team to explain what the thought process behind reducing the BRs of a ton of vehicles while only increasing the BRs of a handful of vehicles is?

Do the people coming up with those BR changes really think they are improving the state of the game by doing this?

Plus, gaijin didn’t show any sources why to buff relikt while gaijin forces its community to use trillions of sources just to buff abrams frontal hull armor…

1 Like

The things I like there is USA gets nice jet with CCIP on 9.3 BR and M1296, that’s really great

1 Like

China
Air
ARH carriers

make PL-12 great again

2 Likes

In addition to this. It makes the already painful Japan air and mid tier ground grind pure flopping agony. I’m probably not alone in thinking that this is purely to boost other countries numbers and/or forcing japanese players to BUY their way forward since the japanese premiums don’t sell that well

Russian premiums destroying multiple BRs…Gaijin fingers in the ear.

Meanwhile poorer performing aircraft have gone up in BR!

You could not make it up

5 Likes

Theres a lot more than 4 playable CAS jets at 9.3. And if you struggle with stingers or iglas at that BR, then all I can really say is skill issue because it is braindead easy to dodge those. Most of them don’t even have a proxy fuse lmao

2 Likes

Hello, is there any chance av8b na can get aim9m? Or were those av8b+ only thing?
Seems quite weird that av8b na sits at higher br than su25t while having significantly worse arms, worse agms, worse ir missiles and less hardpoints. It has tpod but it doesnt help as much as 16 vikhrs, r73 or kh58u

the ground launched Igla overcorrects so much you can just pull 1 slight turn

Have you even played these tanks or do you just like to shit on german mains? There is more to tanks than their main gun you know. The M4 outclasses them in gun handling and T-34 outclasses them in armor. When all the maps favour CQC knife fighting, the advantages of M4 and T-34 reign superior to statistical penetration advantage the Pz.IV gets. They are highly specialized tanks made for sniping from afar that are forced into knife fights by the game. Leopard 1 is plagued with the same issue.

The explanation is the “ton of vehicles” was mostly vehicles that almost never get played.

I take it you have never played 9.3 CAS or SPAA?

Its not clear what the question is even asking here. If they required such a significant increase, that would be reflected on the table.

3 Likes