did you? does not sound like it
3 Likes
The AV-8B NA isn’t getting AIM-9Ms for balance reasons, same goes for the Harrier T.10
It’s just what it is
Buddy, if you struggle with manpads just admit your skill issue, Alpha Jet, Skyhawks, G91s, Migs and so much more are the most peak at 9.3 and literally are mentioned many times over several BR change threads to go up
I do both, actually. Stingers, iglas, mistrals, etc have very little ability to pull so just hold S for a second and they miss. They only work on unaware targets. If you are constantly dying to them, you need to stop blindly flying into the battlefield expecting to be able to press spacebar a few times for some free kills with no competition
Considering the other guy thinks most SPAA have no proxy fuse at that BR (when it’s only stock Fim-92Es), I think you’re questioning the wrong guy.
I’ve shot down plenty of very aware targets with Fim-92Ks. Heavy bomb laden attackers and delta wings don’t fair well against a practically unlimited sink of missiles.
Right, I’ve never seen people use any of those planes in GRB, especially not the early F-5s, the Su-25s, the Su-22s, the F-111A, etc
I guess nobody ever uses the 155mm HE slingers, the Tiger 2s or the IS-2s either. That must be me hallucinating
2 Likes
I wonder, is it possible for the Ozelot go down to 9.3(currently 9.7)or no way because Stats say its fine?
1 Like
If its for arb balance then yes I guess but in grb its just entirely different world compared to su25t. Its nowhere as great and 9m would be little push to help it vs enemy air especially 12.3/12.7 dudes
The only MANPAD that does have proxy fuse is the fim92k. ALL other MANPAD missile has no proxy
1 Like
Aside from the Su-25, you’d be right. Who actually brings the F-5A/C or F-111A into ground battles more than once?
yes. and ive top fragged plenty of times in them at 5.0
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT what does the dev team (and especially people responsible for BR changes) think about the CL-13 Mk.4 effect? That is to say, when increasing BR of an already relatively unpopular vehicle makes it produce better statistics, not worse, and it ends up being raised in BR again back-to-back.
Do BR changes account for a given vehicle’s rate of usage and the populace composition of its players? Is there any procedure for reviewing the least-spawned vehicles in game and returning them back into circulation somehow? Or for making speculative decreases in BR to see if it’d make the vehicle’s stats increase or actually drop?
2 Likes
VEHICLE: SHOLEF SPG
Buff: Increase ammo ready rack
Reason: Currently after using the 3 ammo of ready rack with 7.5 reload, with empty ready rack, the reload will become 24 to 25 seconds with manual reload/ readyrack replenish. Not really in par with other Artillery Vehicles around the same BR.
4 Likes
Yeah, I guess I must be hallucinating then, you seem to know about my experience in GRB better than myself
Your ability to write BR suggestions should be rewoked, you have literally no idea what are you talking about.
3 Likes
I agree with the F-16V/PoBIT going down in BR, also the R2Y2s. J-11A should probably stay where it is as it has the same non digital RWR as the standard Su-27 and J-11, this is a big downside of the plane. On the other hand the Su-30MK2 AMW and Su-30MKK desperately need to go up to 13.7. Not sure if the devs look at the top 1-0.1% of players stats, but comparing the premium Su-30s to other 13.3s should tell a story; just the average doesn’t paint the whole picture. Although it would be very interesting to have access to that sort of information
1 Like
the F5A is goated bro what do you mean?
1 Like