considering the last decision to out of nowhere and probably because of an old event that can be referred as the
cl13 case (9.0 to 9.3) tnx to a very specific group of people that using the skill performance increase his BR even when it was extremely underperforming
i really don’t understand the BR 9.0
i don’t believe it can be compared to tank like OF40 mk2, X803, M60 TTS, Leo A1, Class 3 P, 279, BMP3, and the Chinese 9.0 gen 2 thermal gang
or be better than the APZ.K A2 / and the SK-105 A2 are 8.7 that for now share the same BR but have more tech (gen 2 thermal, drone, spotting, a turret ; ), and even a better round) with the same fire rate
the fact of the transmission always breaking while receiving shot no armor against APFSDS you’re dead if you get hit and at 30 degree sideways you can’t aim (even more hull aim is already a tragedy by itself) really compromise its performance and usability
and now even the leo with betther ammo thermal and a stab have the same br while in the mean time t58 sit at 8.7
in synthesis considering that no one remember this thing even exist is say
ground RB Strv 103 C 9.0 → 8.7
Does no one really care about ACE? Every time you make adjustments, I have to rebuild my lineups. The ACE crews for some vehicles conflict with each other.
They can lock an F-117 from 18-20,000 ft. Not only lock, but also climb that distance and still have enough energy to chase the F-117 (ask me how I know). At that distance most ground vehicles are invisible without the camera.
Stingers pull nearly double that an Aim-9B can. That being said, F-84F does literally struggle to dodge a 9B if it has any munitions or isn’t near its top speed.
Planes have limited travel time, and SPAA can fire multiple Stingers in quick succession.
It was locked onto the ground next to it. There’s a difference.
That’s the thing, SPAA can make mistakes and suffer few consequences.
AH-56A: 6x BGM-71C
UH-1C: 6x BGM-71C
AH-1F: 8x BGM-17D
I thought they both had 8x but I could be mistaken.
fair
The AH-56A is not 9.7 for its rocket rushing though. It’s 9.7 for its TOWs, which the UH-1C also has.
It gives it more options on how to play, but doesn’t necessarily means it should have a higher BR on its own.
i don’t think it will, plus if we’re wanting realism then why are we not giving it a realistic loadout? plus i don’t think it will kill the plane it will make it better when facing f14s and su30
It faces a few at a time. At 13.0 it will face whole teams of ARH slingers pretty much every game. With 30 pops of CMs of which only like 15-20 are chaff. No.
u do know 20k ft is 6km… there fore… not beyond visual range…
sure it can reach its range is like like 11km after locking (on a good day)
but not beyond visual range…
Gneisenau
Naval RB
7.7->8.3
besides being competely fiction this ship ties bismarck for first place as best german BB it should not face 6.7 ships its literally .3 higher than scarnhorst but better due to larger guns with more pen at range making her a lot better in current MM its basically equal to bismarck
the only thing that kept scarnhorst balanced at 7.3 was the pen being very bad at range
