It’s would be more persuasiveness if you referred this KLJ7A type. This one also can provide a wide scanned capability
1 Like
it wouldnt
because you guys dont have a source saying that the J-16 uses that radar
it cant be that hard to understand
as you can see - yes
1 Like
And it seems to perform better too — more tracks, longer detection range… but the big thing is that 200° search angle.
1 Like
Worth noting that there seems to be an PLA domestic variant of the radar named JKL-24
It’s being fitted on the J-10A as a MLU to replace the Type 1473
1 Like
This is the cheap bid product for the KLJ‑7A, which has no advantage other than its air‑cooled design that allows it to directly replace the KLJ‑7 on the Jeff II. Also, this document doesn’t mention its scanning angle. in reality, it’s still ±60°.
[DEV] J-16 should have WS-10B Series 3 engines - Fixed.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wFAJQOFOjyrP
5 Likes
J16 at El Alamein airshow 2026!
4 Likes
Yep, definitely cleaner than WT.
4 Likes
Reports like this give the chinese community a bad name
3 Likes
At least for me, the game really doesn’t make you realize how freaking massive these planes are irl.
2 Likes
True, all because we get no hangarman.
1 Like
They should make return the playable hangarman mechanic to get close to vehicles
1 Like
the AI/slop spam is unreal lmao
iam afraid that it is already too late
Gaijin should bring back and keep that walk around mechanic…like idk why they didnt keep it…maybe it was making it easier to see model problems lol
2 Likes
fr, its 5% actual reports with sources and good info, 20% are reports without actual sources and the rest % is just pure malding and slop spam