one important note: if you see Gempurwira watermark a lot of times are Photoshops
although recently among military enthusiasts was playing around an idea of localized Su-30MKM MLU upgrades via Turkish made sensors and weaponry, given MKM is one of most NATO compatible Flankers known, plus MKM’s major overhauls are done in house rather than send back to Russia(or Belarus) as most operators did
Missiles not being available due to a nation not buying them is not a factor as already confirmed multiple times. As long as the aircraft is capable of using them (like in this case, being a Su-30 and therefore still possibly having the capability) it can have them
This is seen on things like the Swiss Hornets, Swedish Gripen C’s, etc. They are still capable of carrying them, and the nation not having said weapon is no longer a factor.
Well is there proof of the Kh-38 having some sort of specific component on said Su-30’s that is needed for it? And that this does not have it? If so, it can be bug reported.
So far I’ve only seen people comment about it but post no proof about this specifically not gonna lie
It’s never been advertised for use on su-30mki variants, only the base su-30mk. Tho atp idrc, I’ve long realized gaijin standards changes every single time another vehicle drops
Yeah that’s why I said b4 that it’s only meant for mk, not mki variants. And no su30sm brochure shows kh38 as options while plenty of su35 brochures do. IMO it’s no use taking up to gaijin, they do as they please so it’s whatever atp